Recently, AI-generated posters have started appearing throughout the school, raising concerns among students about creativity and authenticity. While the posters may be cool at first glance, many students feel they lack originality and take away opportunities for real artists who are littering the community.
Some students realize that there might be practical reasons behind the decision.
“I get why they did it; they could’ve been on a time crunch,” said senior Maddie Glanton.
School events can operate on tight schedules, and the use of AI might seem like a quick and efficient solution when deadlines are approaching. But this convenience comes with a cost.
Others believe the use of AI sends the wrong message.
“I think using AI instead of just finding a kid or art teacher to make a poster is honestly sad to see,” said senior Sara Mohammad.
This perspective highlights the larger issue: students and staff who do have the skills to create an eye-catching poster are being overlooked. Instead of showcasing student talent, the school is relying on technology that requires no human creativity.
In some cases, the use of AI has even become a source of humor.
“Oh yeah, that poster was funny, only because it was so obviously AI,” junior Sydney Sullivan said. While some may find it amusing, this reaction points out how noticeable and unnatural some designs can be.
Beyond creativity, the use of AI posters also raises questions about what schools choose to value. Schools often encourage students to be involved, explore their talents, and take pride in their work, especially in areas like art and design. Replacing those opportunities with AI can feel contradictory to those goals. It may also discourage students who are interested in creative fields from sharing their skills if they feel like their work is not needed or appreciated. In the long run, continuing to rely on AI for things like school posters could slowly reduce student participation.
Overall, the introduction of AI-generated posters in our schools has sparked debate about efficiency versus creativity. And even though it might save time, many students believe schools should prioritize student involvement and artistic expression over convenience.
